<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Australian Ecommerce Web Design &#38; Website Development News &#187; Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalfinery.com.au/blog/category/bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalfinery.com.au/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 03:00:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SEO for Bing</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalfinery.com.au/blog/2009/10/seo-for-bing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalfinery.com.au/blog/2009/10/seo-for-bing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BlackMax</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demystifying SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo for bing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackmaxmedia.com.au/blog/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been ignoring Bing as a search engine, mostly because it&#8217;s made by the evil Microsoft. However, it&#8217;s now overtaken Yahoo for most of our clients sites as the second largest search engine referrer. That is no threat to Google &#8230; <a href="http://www.digitalfinery.com.au/blog/2009/10/seo-for-bing/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been ignoring Bing as a search engine, mostly because it&#8217;s made by the evil Microsoft. However, it&#8217;s now overtaken Yahoo for most of our clients sites as the second largest search engine referrer. That is no threat to Google as the Big G still takes about 90% of the search engine credit, but I&#8217;m surprised it&#8217;s overtaken Yahoo so rapidly. It could still be the novelty factor, but it could also indicate real competition.</p>
<p>So, not to be left out in the cold, the key factors for number one websites in Bing seem to be:</p>
<ul>
<li> having an old domain name</li>
<li> having quality inbound links, specifically from pages that have the same keywords in the title</li>
<li> then the usual good amount of quality content (I&#8217;ve read Bing likes more than 300 words on a page), clean code and a sitemap</li>
</ul>
<p>If you&#8217;ve done a good job of optimising your site for Google then your rankings shouldn&#8217;t be too different for Bing. If you&#8217;ve got loads of spammy links holding your website up in Google then these won&#8217;t help you in Bing. Bing seems to like better qualified links than Google &#8211; it&#8217;s about time!</p>
<p>Read more over at <a href="http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/webmaster/archive/2009/09/03/search-engine-optimization-for-bing.aspx">Bing</a></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=SEO+for+Bing+http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2Fi3fNhQ" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.digitalfinery.com.au/blog/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=SEO+for+Bing+http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2Fi3fNhQ" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalfinery.com.au/blog/2009/10/seo-for-bing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

